Skip to content
Fund metrics
RoR

Rate of Return

The percentage gain or loss on invested capital, expressed relative to the 1.00x break-even point rather than as a raw multiple.

Percentage

$

Cumulative cash and stock returned to LPs to date

$

Capital LPs have actually paid into the fund

Computed — updates as you type

Rate of return

–.––×
break-even · 1.00×

Awaiting inputs — enter distributions and paid-in capital to plot the arc.

Paid-in Distributed
Return % = (Net multiple − 1) × 100 =

Formula

Rate of Return=(Net Multiple1)×100\text{Rate of Return} = (\text{Net Multiple} - 1) \times 100
Total distribution ÷ total paid-in capital

What it measures

The same underlying performance as net multiple, reframed as a percentage gain or loss relative to break-even (1.00x = 0%) rather than as a raw multiple — a format many LPs find more intuitive to reason about.

Why it matters

Percentages communicate gain/loss more directly than multiples for some audiences — '+80%' reads faster than '1.8x' for anyone doing quick mental comparisons against other percentage-denominated benchmarks like public market indices.

How to read it

A rate of return of +80% means LPs have a net multiple of 1.8x — 80% ahead of their paid-in capital. A rate of return of -25% means a net multiple of 0.75x — LPs have received 75 cents back per dollar paid in so far. This metric does not annualize or account for time value of money; a +80% return over 3 years and the same +80% over 10 years show identically here — use Gross IRR when the holding period matters to the comparison.

What good looks like

Good

Positive and growing rate of return, tracking ahead of relevant public-market or fund benchmarks.

Watch

Rate of return flat near 0% for an extended period.

Bad

Materially negative rate of return with no realistic recovery path in the remaining portfolio.

Watch-outs

  • Treating this as an annualized return — it is a point-in-time percentage, not a compounded or time-weighted figure.
  • Comparing rate of return across funds with very different holding periods without also checking Gross IRR.
  • Reading a negative rate of return as a permanent loss rather than checking unrealized value (RPI) that isn't captured in a distributions-only multiple.

Worked example

Hypothetical

Rate of Return=(1.81)×100=+80%\text{Rate of Return} = (1.8 - 1) \times 100 = +80\%

LPs have paid in $20M and received $36M in distributions — a net multiple of 1.8x. Rate of return = (1.8 − 1) × 100 = +80%.

FAQ

Is rate of return the same as IRR?

No — despite both being percentages, IRR annualizes returns to account for how long the capital was invested, while this rate of return is simply the net multiple rescaled as a percentage relative to break-even, with no time dimension.

What does a 0% rate of return mean?

It means a net multiple of exactly 1.00x — LPs have received back exactly what they paid in, no more, no less.

Why would rate of return be negative?

It's negative whenever the net multiple is below 1.00x, meaning distributions to date are less than paid-in capital — common early in a fund's life before realizations begin, or in an underperforming vintage.

Related

Track Rate of Return across your whole portfolio automatically

Plantactic computes Rate of Return and every other fund metric directly from your contracts and cap tables — no more spreadsheet math.

Get a demo