Skip to content
Fund metrics
DPI

Distributions to Paid-in Capital

The realized portion of fund performance — how much cash a fund has actually returned to LPs per dollar they've paid in, excluding any unrealized value.

Multiple

$

Cumulative cash distributed to LPs

$

Capital called from LPs to date

DPI — realized gauge

–.––×

Enter distributions and paid-in capital to see realized value returned.

0.00x0.25x0.50x0.75x1.00x
DPI = Distributions ÷ Paid-in capital =

Formula

DPI=Total DistributionTotal Paid-in Capital\text{DPI} = \dfrac{\text{Total Distribution}}{\text{Total Paid-in Capital}}
Cumulative cash distributed to LPsCapital called from LPs to date

What it measures

The one number that answers 'how much real cash has come back to LPs' — unlike TVPI or MOIC, DPI contains no marks, projections, or unrealized value. It's the hardest, most conservative performance number a fund reports.

Why it matters

LPs distinguish 'paper returns' from real ones, and DPI is the metric that can't be inflated by optimistic marks. Institutional LPs often weight DPI heavily when re-upping into a GP's next fund, since it's proof of actual realizations rather than promised ones.

How to read it

DPI of 0.6x means LPs have received 60 cents back for every dollar they've paid in — still below their capital back, let alone profit. DPI naturally starts at 0 and climbs only as exits happen; a young fund with DPI near zero isn't underperforming, it simply hasn't had a realization event yet. DPI crossing 1.0x is the moment LPs have gotten their capital back in cash.

What good looks like

Good

DPI climbing steadily past 1.0x by year 8-10 of the fund, showing the fund is realizing gains, not just marking them up.

Watch

DPI still near zero well into a fund's harvest period, with performance carried entirely by unrealized value.

Bad

DPI stuck near zero with no realization events on the horizon — LPs have seen no actual cash back.

Watch-outs

  • Treating a low DPI as underperformance without checking fund age — DPI is expected to be near zero for the first several years of most venture funds.
  • Confusing DPI with TVPI, which includes unrealized value and will always be equal to or higher than DPI.
  • Ignoring DPI in favor of TVPI alone — TVPI can be inflated by optimistic marks; DPI can't.

Worked example

Hypothetical

DPI=$32M$50M=0.64x\text{DPI} = \dfrac{\$32\text{M}}{\$50\text{M}} = 0.64\text{x}

LPs have paid in $50M and received $32M in cash distributions to date. DPI = $32M ÷ $50M = 0.64x — 64 cents on the dollar has come back in cash so far.

FAQ

Why is DPI more trusted than TVPI by some LPs?

DPI reflects only actual cash returned — there's no valuation judgment involved. TVPI includes unrealized marks, which can be optimistic and haven't been tested by an actual sale.

What does a DPI above 1.0x mean?

It means LPs have received more cash back than they paid in — their capital is fully returned and everything from that point is profit, before accounting for any remaining unrealized value.

How fast should DPI grow?

It depends on strategy — buyout funds typically realize faster than early-stage venture funds, where meaningful exits often don't happen until years 6-10. Compare DPI against funds of the same vintage and strategy.

Related

Track Distributions to Paid-in Capital across your whole portfolio automatically

Plantactic computes Distributions to Paid-in Capital and every other fund metric directly from your contracts and cap tables — no more spreadsheet math.

Get a demo